[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.15166455 [View]
File: 323 KB, 600x615, CEBL6m2LSYy7-zeS5jedPJ5WCxybCOyFWMzoK-mEcs4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15166455

>Only 3 options

>> No.15155595 [View]
File: 323 KB, 600x615, CEBL6m2LSYy7-zeS5jedPJ5WCxybCOyFWMzoK-mEcs4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15155595

>>15155568
Can you come up with an argument that isn't an incredulously toned rhetorical question?

I'm saying it's completely tyrannical to punish people for their beliefs and even more tyrannical to retroactively apply such laws to criminalise acts that happened long before any such law existed. Where is your counter-argument?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]