/lit/ - Literature

>>23076751
Ok Shia.

>>20819742
Based, please accelerate us into full blown ultramodern corporativism please.

>>20335339
>How do I avoid letting my immense disgust for based tradlarper 4chan "christians" overwhelm my interest in Christianity?
Stop spending time in Christian Larp /lit/ threads and go to the local Church of the denomination of your choice (I assume you are already lost to God anyways since you are mentioning Christians and not Catholics, so it won't matter in the end).
Tomorrow is Sunday, anon. Just do it.

>>20166384
I'll allow it.

>>19954428
>The only standard everyone can agree on for convenience is empirical evidence.
I disagree. A priori sciences do not require empirical proofs, but sometimes find their expressions in empirical events.
>I mean it's proof on a subjective level only.
And before you can speak of a metaphysic, with all it implies, you need to have a proper handling of your subjectivity. Pure intuition is "proof" for the descriptions of pure ideal and transcendental objects, that is, those that do not contain any empirical essences, and thus escape the empirical realm.
>The implication here is that all paths are valid regardless of where they lead.
I should apologize for implying that, that is obviously wrong, but in the case of meditation, if it is followed by a study of the content of your meditation, then the fruit of the labour should show the value of the method. You shouldn't ask for the truth today, tomorrow or next year, you should get on your knees and pray that you might be lucky enough to glimpse at it once before the next decade.
Just do it.