/lit/ - Literature

>>16295966
Well I was unfairly pressing the poster on the use of the term 'deconstruct', which of course people use in a very wide sense, but my question was in earnest: how Derrida his work relates to 'critical theory' of Adorno. And your fair answer doesn't really answer that

>>12244203
nice bait

Like it's that even a question. Livin in his and his lobsterites' head rent free

>>12068721
It really hit me when I stopped trusting intellectuals themselves. They were the last "barrier" and finally I was left out in the cold.

>the protagonist is a writer as a young man

Derrida playing cricket with home-made equipment.

>>11662632
Since you seem to know quite a bit about it, maybe I should ask something. Do you think the actual infinite as Leibniz or Spinoza described it is taken for granted by Deleuze? It seems like it's there, but afaik Deleuze isn't explicit about using it in his own system. He mentions that it's a rather forgotten model, probably due to scientific progress, but his pure difference (relations all the way down so to speak) seems to rely on it. It's a really unintuitive way of thinking, but maybe there is something to it.

You walk to your front yard and see this mad french pomo deconstructing your lawn, what do you do?

Thoughts?

>>11359303
Here, have another one

literally the most based human to ever live