/lit/ - Literature

>>6393287

Implying capitalism is not equally fueled by bitter losers- people chasing dreams they can never reach. Some even resorting to bitter irony or criticism of the culture of the masses- but never truly freeing themselves from it, especially not through mediocre contrariness.

Implying those who advocate socialism are motivated by some vague possibility of being personally better off, rather than ideals of justice.

Implying poor people are socialists while poor people are usually the most committed capitalists and nationalists- bitter losers.

Implying any American can have an objective opinion on an ideology that was demonized by government propaganda for 60 years.

The level of plebness is disturbing even for a bait post, comrade.

>>6365603

Well capitalism definitely ruined a shitload of my incentive so I don't see how communism could be any worse.

But capitalism at least provides a strong incentive for the weak-minded. Though I guess communism also deals with that through ideological brainwashing.

Nope. Pretty much every ideology handles incentive with care.