/lit/ - Literature

>>12402353
>Process philosophy is in relation to constructing signs for ideograms and embedding them into logical relations and then inferring from these interrelations a process that is communicated as either right or wrong?
i don't know. maybe. i find myself repeating my love for the tea room these days. or Frank Lloyd Wright interiors. the salient characteristic being: minimal furniture. maximal openness. lots of light. little talking. that's how i think the mind is supposed to be. writing Capital must have driven Marx out of his goddamn mind.

>Your moving back from a computer to a being aren't you?
what do you mean? in some sense, i want to say that if it doesn't cross your mind at some point that there is some charm in thinking like a computer, maybe you've missed a step and should go back and reflect. and also because none of us is the standard model for being. here again, the enduring love for psychotherapy and Heidegger, much else. i am human only inasmuch as i relate to you as one. or perhaps what the Buddha had in mind when he talked about *sentient* beings. or Herbert on the dangers of being ruled by either thinking machines *or* animals. ah, the old Gom Jabbar.

still tho i don't think i've quite answered your question, and i find them interesting. also i'd like to keep the thread alive, so bumping also. no way to bump a thread except with some appropriate music as well, so, that too.

Hybrid: Beachcoma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOrzgQ9Wb8s