/lit/ - Literature

>>10971666
First of all hello satan. Second of all I think your return to the simple is premature. Granted in God all things are simple and exist in complete unity, but I don't think you can ever really see this in the existent universe. I think multiplicity is probably the truest expression of unity. For example you imply that common folk singers have some transcendent value over technical formalists. I think it depends on what kind of technical formalists we're talking about. I could agree here if we were talking about the branch of serialists that deploy stochastic processes in music, that is a regression. But Gregorian music is also highly formal and not all the time simple. I would argue that complexity is necessary to express concepts with sufficient resolution. True wisdom I don't think lies in simplicity but rather has simplicity as its inner core or end goal, and that simplicity produces multiplicity and vice versa, they both serve their purpose in the whole scheme of the instrumentality of things, but I don't think you can ever put them together in the here and now, they only come together in the divine intellect and until then we must respect both simplicity and multiplicity.

>>9065060
>entered her like she was a lottery
>galloping abs
wow