/lit/ - Literature

>>17195986

>>16689425

>>14857910
Yes in quantities that assimilate. These also fail into failure to reproduce. As the volume increases, so will enclaves. And enclaves are potent

>>14831696
Western as in showing awrah?

>>14783821

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9viemJwvVrM

>>14651259
>sciences of the materialists
Al-Nawawi (who is being quoted at this point in the Reliance of the Traveller) wrote in the 13th Century, “sciences” then meant what “philosophy” does now, “sciences of the materialists” meant specific philosophical schools that taught the universe was an eternal perpetual motion made of simple atoms. To project our use of materialist sciences onto Medieval terminology is so anachronistic I shouldn’t have to actually bother but the guy doesn’t care to note that al-Nawawi is saying this. Philosophy here is of course a translation of “falsafa” which by this time also referred to a specific school which taught doctrines like the eternity of creation, it doesn’t mean “philosophy” in the broader sense, which is actually strongly endorsed (as are the physical sciences) in the work “The Revival of the Religious Sciences”, by al-Ghazali (a crucial Shafi’i thinker).

>jihad
Community (can also be be translated as nation, means country in this context) obligation means that Muslim states are obligated to conquer non-Muslim states, yes. Individual obligation means if you are a member of said state and it goes to war, you are obligated to fight. This shouldn’t be confused with randomly lashing out in your own land.

>wives and slaves
Already went over the wives bit. Every Muslim can have any number of slaves.

>infallible
Already disproved that, at least in the sense he is using it. That the Prohet’s ﷺ teachings are without flaw and that he is our role model, yes, these are true,

>mocking the Prophet ﷺ!
There are several things considered martyrdom in Islam if a man dies in defense of, they are primarily his religion, his family and his honor. If someone insults your honor, you are entitled to seek redress. Preferably this is handled by the legal system to prevent feuds, but if there is no legal system that adresses this and the person isn’t a Muslim, you are entitled to handle it yourself. Anyway, yes, of course, mocking the Prophet ﷺ is not something we take lightly, as has been proven by people who tried to test us on that. This is however quite distinct from bans on musical instruments or iconography. And once again poetry is not haram unless it is lewd or blasphemous or something of that sort.

>>14309290

Who are some good 20th Century critics of modernity like Maududi and Seraphim Rose and Richard Weaver?

>>14196230
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rZwnJ1cE1s [Open]


>This is to say nothing about Salafism/Wahhabism just being crypto-atheism
It's literally just a revival of the creed of Imam Ahmed Hanbal without the additions of later developement in his school after his death, also with a Zihiri movement that's a revival of Ibn Hazm's teachings.

>outside of the Shia world Salafism/Wahhabism is the dominant Islmaic ideology.
Please stop, you have no clue what you're talking about, I say this as a Salafi. Most Islamists are not Salafis, in fact the counter movement to Islamism in Middle East is mostly Madkhali, a major Salafi strain shilling for Saud. The only big Salafi Islamist movement is the Sahwa. The Taliban and the Muslim Brotherhood are not Salafis, they are Maturidi and Ashari respectively. The big fundamentalist movement in the UK is Deobandi (rationalists Sufis), Salafis are a minority in it

>>14196336

>>14196230
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rZwnJ1cE1s


>This is to say nothing about Salafism/Wahhabism just being crypto-atheism
It's literally just a revival of the creed of Iman Ahmed Hanbal without the additions of later developement in his school, also with a Zihiri movement that's a revival of Ibn Hazm's teachings.

>outside of the Shia world Salafism/Wahhabism is the dominant Islmaic ideology.
Please stop, you have no clue what you're talking about, I say this as a Salafi. Most Islamists are not Salafis, in fact the counter movement to Islamism in Middle East is mostly Madkhali, a major Salafi strain shilling for Saud. The only big Salafi Islamist movement is the Sahwa. The Taliban and the Muslim Brotherhood are not Salafis, they are Maturidi and Ashari respectively.

>>14028857
What

>Iranians
Shia are notoriously pinko. they are the only Muslims who literally ruled sex changes and cross dressing are halal

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rjvVbnXll70

>>14004494
The British came onto OUR soil and forced us into a "Commonwealth" at gunpoint. Now because of that Commonwealth, many Muslim countries have open immigration to the UK. So that is why. Inshallah we will rule Britain one day

>>13985889
>then why are you so passive about it?
I'm a Muslim.

What are contemporary ways to "ride the tiger"?

>>13659341
Lol

https://twitter.com/Suffragentleman/status/1155446605627174912?s=19

https://www.firstthings.com/article/2019/05/why-i-became-muslim

https://twitter.com/AspiringSenin/status/1150878329379180550?s=19

>>13644441
I think not

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hr0MD1jQ58g

https://twitter.com/AspiringSenin/status/1150878329379180550?s=19

https://twitter.com/Suffragentleman/status/1155446605627174912?s=19

https://www.firstthings.com/article/2019/05/why-i-became-muslim

https://twitter.com/ApostateRidvan/status/1157427161743134721?s=19

I see a great deal of literature on the "decline of western civilization" but does contemporary "western civilization" actually bear a real ontological continuity with her predecessors?

>>13575206

https://twitter.com/Suffragentleman/status/1155446605627174912?s=19

>>13570616
https://twitter.com/Suffragentleman/status/1155446605627174912?s=19

Lads, you DO know the credibility of most fallacies is based on appeal to authority?