/lit/ - Literature

>>21820659
The truth about sex has always been simple and intuitive to my mind. The division remains reducible to giver and receiver.
Women do not have penises, they can only mimic the aggressive outward forcing that is masculinity. A woman can never really rape. The ocean can swallow a ship, but the ship is the thing itself plunging downward.
Women will always be safe and inoffensive. A stream of sewage could come out a woman's mouth and would still appear as sweet.
The nastiness of which they are capable is rarely outwardly bold, but only takes an indirect or passive aggressive form. A woman's power comes either in a rejection of her own feminity to the purpose of aping the aesthetic of men, or in fully exploiting men's insane sexual desire. Or thirdly in other sophisticated social maneuverings.
On the point of form, a woman's beauty suffocates, intoxicates, and draws inward. Like those insect traps full of sweet bait , and the insects all buzzing around dashing themselves madly getting stuck, dying to get in closer to their death , it surrounds and suffocates those little things seeking their own dissolution. Men are in this regard much more tiny and futile. A man's beauty lies at the point of a singular point, powerful and destructive. We have only this. A woman is abundant, everything or nothing, . Swollen. Sickly Sweet. A shiny red apple is a great joy for the worm, which can only takes and eats and probes, and now it's gone. And that is of course only how a man views it, for him a temporary madness that dissolves itself. Male sexuality is suicidal, though indifferent, detached. A man can never give fully; he remains separated.
The paradox of contemporary female empowerment is that to be powerful in a visible sense--i.e in a political sense--women must evoke masculine elements. Female politicians like Merkel or Hillary Clinton cut their hair like men, wear masculine clothing, and speak in typical male mannerisms. In competing with men she must necessarily become like men, since on the debate stage power has to be met with equal open power. That is to say domination and destruction of the opponent using reason. And so feminine strategies here in the eyes of an audience are ineffectual.
The reality remains that masculinity is power, not in the sense of "patriarchy", but that the actual form of men is itself power. Raw power unreserved and independent.
There's power in feminity but the power is gained through the feigning of a lack of power. Women know intuitively how to play to mens' desire to feel useful, to get them to do things they themselves don't want to or can't do.
But this is not raw power; it is more sophisticated since it is the power which comes from the lack of simple power, and so plays into mens' inherent egoism.