/lit/ - Literature

>>21344009
I think it's an issue of function vs form. For male players the characters simply perform different functions, and they pick whichever based on which functions best suits their playstyle. For women it's more about the form, they're more interested in the aesthetics of the characters and specifically aesthetics that match their gender.

Then if we look at OPs image, perhaps women can't enjoy classical literature because it doesn't involve that specific form they are interested in empathizing with. Perhaps that form is the "modern day woman" but no classic can be writing for the modern day anyone, they had no idea what the modern day would even look like. Functionally the stories still work and are brilliant though.

>>20150332
get MOGed

>>18893162
yes

>>18375904
>It's not complicated
Counter point, it is complicated and you explain why right here
>of course it has to be convoluted bullshit

>>7905849
>mfw I bet a million dollars you are a flat, one-dimensional human being
>mfw I can almost guarantee there is nothing interesting about you aside from the money you make and the material things you own
>mfw if you took out students loans and yet still decided to type this out
>mfw your job makes you its bitch to the point you have to worry about things even on your days off

>>7830334
>You can change man. I did.

>>7402005
mfw becheuse

>>7176654

>implying they each died for true love
>implying it wasn't a teenage angst fuelled suicide pact to get back at their overbearing, one-upmanship families
>implying 'Romeo & Juliet' isn't YA

>mfw reading this thread