/lit/ - Literature

>>17104220

>>16743287
>So you're basically Joe Rogan but more pompous
pic rel.

>>16743342
>>16743351
I do take this work pretty seriously, and yes, I am open to genuine criticism. I realize that the science basedboys are going to sperg out about the bibliography, and thematic content, I want to try and improve this so we can shut these people up forever.

>>16743711
>>16743719

It isn't necessary to understand the laws of thermodynamics to understand this process. Aside from that, this is not the main subject of the book, it is a necessary precondition of the natural world that I am describing in the later pages. If you want to write a book about the relationship of thermodynamics to expanding earth theory, be my guest. It just isn't important enough to warrant serious focus or attention for this particular kind of historiographical analysis that I am performing on ancient texts.

Go watch the Neil Adams vids on youtube, it's really extremely simple to understand. If you don't believe him, go watch how literally takes the time to BTFO EVERYONE in the comment section. All of these science basedboys walk away limping, it's pretty impressive desu.

>>16326615
>Try chopping firewood and reciting the Psalms from memory.