[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19204045 [View]
File: 52 KB, 313x475, 588138._SY475_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Is Joseph Campbell worth reading?

>> No.18979048 [View]
File: 52 KB, 313x475, 588138._SY475_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18979048

What am I in for?

>> No.18902524 [View]
File: 52 KB, 313x475, 588138._SY475_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18902524

Been on the fence with this one, should I read it? Is there anything I should know beforehand?

>> No.17161218 [View]
File: 52 KB, 313x475, 588138._SY475_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161218

>Modern literature is devoted, in great measure, to a courageous, open-eyed observation of the sickeningly broken figurations that abound before us, around us, and within. Where the natural impulse to complain against the holocaust has been suppressed - to cry out blame, or to announce panaceas - the magnitude of an art of tragedy more potent (for us) than the Greek finds realization: the realistic, intimate, and variously interesting tragedy of democracy, where the god is beheld crucified in the catastrophes not of the great houses only but of every common home, every scourged and lacerated face. And there is no make-believe about heaven, future bliss, and compensation, to alleviate the bitter majesty, but only utter darkness, the void of unfulfillment, to receive and eat back the lives that have been tossed forth from the womb only to fail. In comparison with all this, our little stories of achievement seem pitiful; Too well we know what bitterness of failure, loss, disillusionment, and ironic unfulfillment galls the blood of even the envied of the world! Hence we are not disposed to assign to comedy the high rank of tragedy. Comedy as satire is acceptable, as fun it is a pleasant haven of escape, but the fairy tale of happiness ever after cannot be taken seriously; it belongs to the never-never land of childhood, which is protected from the realities that will become terrible known soon enough; just as the myth of heaven ever after is for the old, whose lives are behind them and whose hearts have to be readied for the last portal of the transit into night - which sober, modern Occidental judgement is founded on a total misunderstanding of the realities depicted in the fairy tale, the myth, and the divine comedies of redemption. These, in the ancient world, were regarded as of a higher rank than tragedy, of a deeper truth, of a more difficult realization, of a sounder structure, and of a revelation more complete.
Can someone help me translate this, clause-by-clause? Is the entire book this masturbatory? Do people actually care about ornate prose in a work of non-fiction?

>> No.11866136 [View]
File: 48 KB, 313x475, 1510071836228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11866136

I really liked this book. Give me some recommendations based on this

>> No.11623945 [View]
File: 48 KB, 313x475, 588138.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623945

>> No.10879637 [View]
File: 48 KB, 313x475, 588138.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10879637

>>10878972

Why haven't I heard him namedrop pic related? Seems pretty closely related to what he talks about.

Is it any good, by the way?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]