/lit/ - Literature

>>20154116
>omg its putler its LITERALLY appeasement don't give him the hecking sudentenkraine

They are mostly on philosophical topics spamming their retarded mainstream interpretations of things and even shittier arguments like muh obey authority .

>>20095669
lol
lmao

>WOAH! Latin! I hecking love the Classicerinos!

>>20086772
>Hes only ever read European authors

>>20086257
>There has to be a Christian Bible which takes out all the useless parts and just leaves the stuff needed to understand the western canon and art. Thousands of years and no one made that?

>>20085386
>Sounds horrible. What I don't understand is why virtually all incels and chuds are so anti-science. They all love to highlight scientific hypocrisy, cruelty, and corruption, but they just ignore the massive amount of innovations and technology scientists make. Sure, there have been corrupt scientists who faked fraudulent safety data and all that stuff, but what about the thousands of researchers, professors, advocates who spent their lives in school and dedicated their life to developing medications, studying global warming, improving dietary science, and so on.

>>20084921
>Just because books exists deboonking it doesn't mean they are right

>>20083181
>hasn't been one in a while. draw and guess scenes from books.

>>20080359
>offers nothing but baselessly smug critique of critique
lavish your energies on your original genius instead

>>20075546
>doesn't relate an example from their own (thrilling and rich) social life
>NO, IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE AWKWARD, OK?!?

>>20081248
>Dude you need to calm down now

>>20081163
>It's ok to skip this one, right?

>>20079867
>I do not think there is as much unhappiness in us as vanity, nor as much malice as stupidity. We are not so full of evil as of inanity; we are not as wretched as we are worthless.

>>20079761
>Any books other than this that talks about the use of Guilds to bring back literature and western civilization?

>>20080725
>Was it autism?

>>20079549
>Looking for a book that's written by a pseudonym. The pseudonym is just a bunch of numbers or alphanumerical. the copy I remember had a red cover.

>>20080784
>/Propaganda books suggestion/ general

>>20072473
>Any idea if it’s rare or valuable?

>/lit/ is for the discussion of literature, specifically books (fiction & non-fiction), short stories, poetry, creative writing, etc. If you want to discuss history, religion, or the humanities, go to /his/. If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/. Philosophical discussion can go on either /lit/ or /his/, but those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.

>>20062637
>Can we please have an actual discussion and not just have a thread of >all American authors are le bad

>>20062410
>Please /lit/. Something, some kind of philosophy for fear. I can’t stand this feeling any longer.

>>20061542
>I just want to listen to some old wise dude ramble about history or something like that while i try to sleep.
>Just anything interesting and atypical really. thanks.

>What are some good books about the pitfalls of technology molding us and our thought processes, and the best ways to navigate through and manage this?