/lit/ - Literature

>>23288231
>>23288234
So the argument simply boils down to "it can be used badly and can have negative effects so it should be destroyed".
Then the question becomes well how many positive effects has it had? I'm sure you don' know anyway even though there's probably plenty.
But whatever lets get to the important part what do you actually do about this then. And the only feasible answer is probably government regulation but let me guess you hate government regulation because it's authoritarian so really you're just whining about something you don't really want to fix that probably doesn't even affect you.

>WOO! just finished one of the greatest novels of the 20th century, the sound and the fury!
>really? what was your favorite part
>—duhh…. Erhm the PART WHERE HE SAYS NIGGER!!! faulkner OWNED the WOKE MOB and NIGGERS
These people make up around a third or half of this board

>trying to read
>sister keeps having sex with her boyfriend in the other room

>le everything is a spook!
>omg so insightful!!
Literally 200 years later and people still fucking read such trash, proof that that all it takes to be remembered in philosophy is to convince idiots to play along with your pretentious acting.

>buy book
>never read it
Don't tell me you actually do this, /lit/....

Literally the only thing that people learn from philosophy books are random French phrases that go untranslated for no reason other than to make the text look smarter, like "raison d'etre" or "objet petit a" or whatever.

>>20470830
>ugh, I wish we could go back to when literature wasn't political.
Are you retarded?

Imagine reading some 500 page snoozefest when the summary and theme sections give the important points without even needing to drive to the bookstore/order online and wait a few days.

Do I need to read the Grundrisse or Theories of Surplus Value to understand Marxism or are the 3 Volumes of Capital enough?

>hither and tither
>to and fro

>actually those groups of people that your dick can clearly differentiate between the massive loops you would go to have sex with one, and the other group that would make you vomit at the very idea of having sex with, there's no clear way of differentiating between them scientifically
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOWNua6nRsg&ab_channel=Memology101
Wat do when the highest leaders of your society are lying about the most basic of facts?

>>19556824
>biology that everybody knows
>and that's why women have all the power and should control society and marriage should be abolished and all the dangerous incels have to get brave new worlded I'm a feminist blogger btw

you really thought I would fall for this huh?

>>19450994
>always said I wanted to be a writer
>find out many of the writers I admired drank a lot and said they would write drunk, edit sober
>end up becoming an alcoholic who does not write at all

>Her name was Anna Karenina

>>18579861
Honestly I can understand both Mark Fisher and his students here.

>be me
>make smiths thread in lit
>immediately filled with faggots

>cases
If your language has cases, it's immediately dogshit and nobody should ever learn it

How can I respect female professors or academics when I know they've gagged on cock?

>>15582168
>What's more important than following systems is dismantling and warping them, the act of destruction and political perversion is absolutely a necessary part of the creative process and moves us forwards away from the rot of stagnation
that's a really nice cope you have there, or dare i say "illusive".

>>13483607
>walking your dog is wasting your life
it was your choice to get a dog you idiot.

You still need to learn a programming language.

>be French
>want to read Lolita in the original English
>half of it is French

Most books are longer than they need to be