/lit/ - Literature

Are any of you guys published? Where did it get published and what did you write?

>>21903461
This guy

>>20159258
OP here I'll give it a read then. worried I'm about to get hardore filtered.
Hopefully there is some kino in here and hopefully I'm able to find it more importantly

The "irrefutable" statements Bakker makes are as follows:

1) All statements are equal a priori.

2) All logical statements are equally valid.

Bakker also shows that we are born and die with as much significance as is stated above, so the whole of life is reduced to a singular point of zero entropy.

This is the point where Bakker's logic becomes incoherent. He begins using math to disprove math, which is always a bad idea. In the end, it appears that Bakker may have reached conclusions about entropy and the eye vector he did not intend to derive. Even more bizarre, Bakker's conclusion is apparently that death is in some sense a kind of "zero entropy." Of course, as we have already seen from Kant, in a logically consistent universe, zero entropy is a contradiction in terms.