[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2375806 [View]
File: 6 KB, 320x224, 1317481017535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2375806

>guy with severe addiction problems and depression

>feel like I should be recommending he read Infinite Jest because it's what helped me to overcome my own addiction problems and depression, but my sincere post would just get lost in this sea of trolling

Welp.

Read Infinite Jest, stupid drugged out ex journalism major. I hope you turn your life around, because it sounds like you're going to die soon at the rate you're going.

>> No.2180233 [View]
File: 6 KB, 320x224, 1317481017535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

I'm not sure I understand the intent of this. I know that not everybody that comes to 4chan comes here because of anonymity, but it's certainly the reason why I like to discuss /lit/ and /ck/ and /fa/ and /tv/ and /v/ on 4chan as opposed to reddit or facebook or G+ or any other stable identity- social network. This is an anonymous social network. Anyone can post, anyone can read. That's beautiful and practical and secretive and simple in the extreme.

To ask me to remove my anonymity would mean that my responses to your works and the way I talk and act would immediately change, as I tried very hard to make my online persona match up to my IRL persona (the one attached to my real name). I don't like having to keep a stable personality. I already do that in my professional and private life.

Online life can and, IMO, should be chaotic and shimmering and unknowable. Fixed IDs are no fun at all. I don't want another Driver's License.

>> No.2116173 [View]
File: 6 KB, 320x224, 1317481017535.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>2116155
Search for it on JSTOR! No results. And Bangor University Repository doesn't even load for me... Is this some kind of Jewish conspiracy where they shut down any negative comment against them?

>>2116171
Thanks for the courtesy. :)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]