[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.4102012 [View]
File: 2.55 MB, 1664x4144, Britishirish2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102012

>>4101965

I'm afraid not.

>> No.2799223 [View]
File: 2.55 MB, 1664x4144, Britishirish2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2799223

To the Aspies that gave me shit in the literary turn-offs thread:

I listed a few qualities which discourage me from reading any given book (discourage, not lifetime ban). I asked for recommendations of books WITH those qualities in order to dispel the misgivings I currently hold.

Yes, they are somewhat irrational but I was looking to get over them. This should be encouraged. I am an 18 year old that is trying to explore the world of literature. 'Best of...' lists were not what I was looking for. I included a picture which detailed books I have read along with rough ratings, hoping that you would use that information alongside your literary knowledge to recommend books (fulfilling the aforementioned criterion) especially for me.

It seems this was a foul move on my part. Perhaps I really am retarded and so can not understand why trying to broaden the spectrum of literature I can appreciate is such a villainous thing to do.

My sincerest apologies. Perhaps I should spend some time in the long johns thread and hope the wisdom of /lit/ rubs off onto me.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]