/lit/ - Literature

>>4539757
>but modern science and modern technology are heading down a disasterous path.
Why aren't you preventing it, oh future-sayer?

>I don't want everything turned into a standing reserve and conceal previous AND future modes of revealing.
Choices are being made at every moment seemingly. Ever one thing or the other. Modes of revealing are the same way. People who study physics don't study alchemy and alchemy gets lost. People who study theology don't study medicine and medicine gets lost. People who study philosophy don't study something else and it gets lost eventually.

>Most STEM shits never think outside of the box
What's outside of the box? Why do you need a box?

>modern physics already expects results from nature and searches the best way to get them.
So?

Would you say that Don Quixote is a story making fun of fanboys who take things too seriously and how ridiculous it would be if they actually went out and did that shit?

Kind of like the people that are dressing up as superheroes and vigilantes on the streets

>>2739098
put a smile on my face, gracias anon

I just formulated something and I want to have your opinion on this...

"The origin of Nihilism lies in Utopia"


Where Nihilism is the historical effect of inversion of values.

Czech Republic
Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World
Haruki Murakami