/lit/ - Literature

>>14247149
Not society, something else. Read Klages.

Because American culture is fundamentally dopaminergic, and European culture isn't.

Watch an American art film vs. a European. The former just can't abide in silence. Europeans (ideally) want to depict reality, Americans want to abbreviate it, Americans want a McReality.

So to what extent is all this suspicion and hatred of technology legitimate, and to what extent is it just weak, ambitionless losers being selected out of the society of the future?

Why does it seem like the most successful people are spiritless, and some of the most unsuccessful full of life and fire? What is going on?

I'm absolutely convinced at this point that this garbage is an effect of the "phallogocentric" system it is critiquing, it's really telling that the plasticization of feminine sexuality is going to happen on the back of technological advancement, vast abrupt and these gaggle of fucking twitter trannies and their worship of the self-lacerating Zero or whatever the fuck can kiss my ass, they're not escaping the system, they've hitched themselves along for the ride

It isn't the feminine that is re-distributing sexuality, it is masculine sexuality using technology to erogenize being. Per weininger: male sexuality is concentrated in the glans, feminine sexuality is already diffused throughout the body. This is the dilation of the glans, not the auto-production the vulva.

No wonder lesbianism is so behind this. It isn't trannies exploding the coordinates of gender binaries, it's the feminine's narcissistic appropriation of the phallic's appetite for the feminine: only the male can be an autogynophile. Fuck this shit Im gonna read some Iamblichus