/lit/ - Literature

>>3272926
Yes.

There can be no such thing as accurate with any of it.

Multiple authors with multiple agendas and interpretations have left it the muddled mass of contradictions that make all the choir boys weak in the knees.

I've tried. Its crap. Imo

>>2585626
I know I have.

>>2509248
The bible is against the bible. Say what you mean instead
"Its goes against the Church elders."
Be honest with yourself
>say good bye to having a successful monogamous relationship.
In some cases certainly, but marriage vows are broken more often than a shacked up couple's agreement.
If any given couple are dedicated, then that's that.

>>2438194
They love it too.

The Bible.

I was a well adjusted little toddler before I found out my parents believed in fantasy lands and gods.

"Change" isn't always good.

>>2205681

The Bible contradicts itself. This isn't news.
Sure, it doesn't hold up under critical analysis, but that doesn't negate the fact that it forms the basis of a lot of ideas of morality and personal or not-so-personal philosophy. It's important culturally and it has a few good stories in it too.
Plus, if someone starts trying to bullshit you, you can call them out on it or at least bullshit them back.