[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21580793 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21580793

I want to learn about Burkean conservatism. Where should I start?

>> No.20158126 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, 000000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20158126

Edmund Burke is overrated.

>> No.18982009 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18982009

Burke's defense of monarchy is literally "you're saying that England has had an illegitimate government for hundreds of years? That the authority of every king/queen has rested on illegitimate foundations? Really? Really?". Why do people hold him up as a great thinker? His entire defense of the status quo's legitimacy is "it's right because it exists".

Some of what he says in Reflections is good but his thinking in regards to the foundations of government are awful.

>> No.18799673 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>Hereditary monarchy is okay because it just is, okay???

>> No.18283528 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18283528

What are some books that are under 200 pages but cool as fuck sounding like Burke's A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful or Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

>> No.17333326 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, Edmund Burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17333326

What are some of the major works of Conservative philosophy and are they still worth reading today?

>> No.17313311 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17313311

Are there any reputable modern conservative writers?

>> No.17085904 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, Burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17085904

Burke, Scrton, Eliot, Arnold, Chesterton, Carlyle, Maistre, MacIntyre. Who else should I add?

>> No.16246532 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16246532

Literally Edmund Burke. He was a Whig, the "left-wing" party of Enlightenment-era Britain. Yet today he's considered the founder of modern conservatism.

>> No.16204257 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16204257

Burke, Carlyle, Eliot, Arnold, Chesterton, Scruton. Who else should I add?

>> No.15657250 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15657250

Are there any respectable conservative books?

>> No.15540709 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15540709

>>15540672
Not him, but I've read Burke, and the more right-wing you are, the more Burke starts to come off as a bit schizophrenic. Burke's denunciation of the French Revolution rings much more hollow when you find out that he supported the overthrow of the Stuarts in the Glorious Revolution. What makes the English Revolution acceptable, but not the French Revolution, if their only difference is degrees? Burke would probably say it was "common sense," like >>15540619 says.

Between the two of them I've always liked Samuel Johnson over Burke. Unlike Burke, Johnson opposed the English Revolution and always had Jacobite leanings, despite not being a Catholic himself. Johnson was also strongly opposed to the American Revolution and thought it was totally unjustified.

There's a reason Burke is considered the father of "Conservatism" rather than being considered a reactionary like De Maistre. Burke, and the conservative ideal he founds, is always trying to have it both ways. He wants SOME change, but not too much change, and his grounds for accepting some revolutions but not others aren't really clearly defined.

He's undoubtedly brilliant, though. He's just caught up in his own contradictions.

>> No.15192548 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, burke.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15192548

Are there any books I can read about how we need to return to small communities of like minded people and change what our priorities are in life?

>> No.14492990 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14492990

this nerd i guess. Thomas Paine kinda spanked him, but if you like anti-revolutionary rhetoric Burke might be your fella

>> No.14380781 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, A1FEEC3A-F357-44D2-979C-196C76D159EE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14380781

>The right can’t thi-

>> No.14230999 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14230999

>>14230985

Now look here mister you're gonna read pope and you're gonna like it!

>> No.12989811 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, 04997588-C618-4BA4-B610-FCD1854353E0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12989811

>>12989796
No wonder: read up on the French Revolution and what it did to the once prosperous country of France.

Read Edmund Burke. Everyone, including butterfly, read Edmund Burke. France used to believe in God too.

>> No.12773817 [View]
File: 78 KB, 672x800, 6CAD240A-838F-4B28-87C3-82F3A9D96F7E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12773817

For me, it’s Edmund Burke

>> No.11718212 [View]
File: 96 KB, 672x800, D1487A5A-74C1-4F14-AD26-15102678DA83.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11718212

Does lit feel like it doesn’t have the direction it used to? That its consensus frequently isn’t unanimous? Isn’t this inherently a better state of the board than it used to be? Isn’t it a good thing that it doesn’t have a 100% unanimous consensus on all issues?

Does it have anything to do with the recent trend of religious faith

>> No.11686996 [View]
File: 96 KB, 672x800, EC5A3869-DAA0-4BDA-9D32-C8447FA5341F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11686996

Argue with the king

>> No.11431004 [View]
File: 96 KB, 672x800, 5CB6F914-FDE0-46CA-A747-13937AD74404.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11431004

>>11429053
>>11429056
To this

>> No.11408093 [View]
File: 96 KB, 672x800, 800A3DCE-7997-4644-8C8D-56C32C164079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11408093

ITT post what you’re currently reading and what you’ll be reading next and discuss

Currently:
Seventh book of Pappus’ Collections
Keynes’ General Theory
Ptolemy’s Almagest
Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France
Proclus’ Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements

Next:
Al- Khwarizmi’s Compendious Book On Calculation by Completion and Balancing
Hayek’s Road to Serfdom
Ibn Al-Haytham’s Configuration of the World
Alexis De Tocqueville’s Democracy In America
Aristotle’s Organon

Pappus can get fairly difficult depending on what problems he is dealing with, and I’ve been enjoying Keynes chapter on elasticity. I’m looking forward to starting pic related sometime tonight most likely.

>> No.10518486 [View]
File: 92 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10518486

Where should one start with Edmund Burke's work?

I've been told he's one of the greatest traditionalists

>> No.10057332 [View]
File: 92 KB, 672x800, EdmundBurke1771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10057332

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_by_Edmund_Burke

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]