/lit/ - Literature

>>14165972
>What are we in for in the future?

>>14012617
>The morality of genociding people is more complicated.
The morality of not feeding people and not importing them in your country for dubious economic benefits should be less complicated, though.

>>12893751
White people have money and won't fight back they are likely the easiest target for genocide ever. I actually appreciate the self-restraint demonstrated by non-white communities. With all the prodding in the media and academia I would have expected the massacres to have already begun. I suppose they will wait until they are a majority in current white countries, which won't last long.

>>12458392
blow it out your ass cracka!

>>11103306
>implying R selection exists in humans
Are you joking? You realize that every one of those starving Ethiopians you see during those save the children commercials has 10 kids, right?

>>10793349
4 out of 5 Christian patriarchies are under non-Christian rule. Antioch, Constantinople and Alexandria are under Muslim rule, Jerusalem under Jews. But I don't think it will be Turks who will take Rome. Turks themselves are a decaying people. Kurds will take over Constantinople first than Turks can take Rome.

It's Africans who are on the rise. They will take over Europe, probably North America and the Middle East too

>>10226774
The destruction in Syria was caused by neocon jews who want to take out yet another neighbor of Israel, it had nothing to do with environmental changes.

>>10226776
Think logically though. Where the ecological damage is likely to occur is on continents like Africa, and the cause is the population boom caused by Western medicine. So if you actually want to save the environment, promote policies that limit the population growth who can't function without outside help.

The entire world is fucked.

There are Somalis in Minnesota, Haitians in Chile, Senegalese in Argentina, Uruguay and Southern Brazil, Sudanese in Australia...

Just like the homo sapiens went out of Africa and wiped out other human races like the Neanderthals, the black race will wipe out everyone else in the next century.

>>10019658
>Some people would say that foreign aid has been in many respects harmful to Africa.

There's no question about it. They can't take care of themselves and western aid has allowed the population of Africa to skyrocket to the point where at the end of this century one in four individuals on the planet is projected to be African. That is going to lead to disaster. Think of that, one in four people on this earth being a 70 IQ average African.

>>9676064
My hope is now on the Africans. They will destroy modernity by not being able to maintain it.

>>9562394
Your first mistake is in thinking it's simply about rich and poor (class) instead of biologically based groups of people with different abilities and interests (race).

And we've been feeding the world for decades, and it's going to give us pic related. Feeding people who can't feed themselves only makes things worse.

>>9424609
Everyone else thinks importing the entire population of Africa into developed countries will make no difference.

>629. The population decline of the master race (whites + Japan, who are essentially the whites of Asia) is a phenomenon no one seems able to explain. And yet it's not such a complex matter if you have even a modicum of understanding of what life is all about. Reproduction, like all life, is all about sacrifice. If we take the parents as isolated individuals (as opposed to parts of a cosmic chain), they stand to gain nothing from the creation and rearing of children. The benefits they would receive in old age via means of their children's caretaking are nothing compared to the insane costs they'd have to incur to raise them in the first place, so the transaction is a net expenditure on their part, and by a vast margin. Now the hyperculture of the master race has created a consciousness of how important the rearing process is, and how costly if it is to be done right, so even when members of the master race reproduce, they only create one or two descendants, as opposed to the constant mindless shitting out of fetuses that they used to indulge in when they were uncivilized, or indeed that the subhuman races still continue to this day. So that is one important factor for the master race's population decline. Without it, things would be dramatically different, since with the amount of resources a typical middle class family lavishes on a single child you could raise an entire village of little Middle Eastern towelheads or niggers. In simple terms, the master race is going for quality over quantity, and that's a major part of what's causing the decline.

Really makes you think.

The Western world needs right-wing traditionalism to fend off the coming hordes from Sub-Saharan Africa. Liberalism or socialism simply doesn't have the intellectual framework to justify sinking boats filled with women and children.

Once that problem is solved the West will return to progressivism.