/lit/ - Literature

>>9400110
>thank you for agreeing with me that empirical evidence is not objective truth.
No retard, I said that empirical evidence for objective facts exist whether I am impaired or not. Gravity exists, if I was impaired and didn't think gravity was real, it wouldn't change the fact that gravity is real. Are you stupid?
>Your senses can and do fail to provide accurate information about reality
Not a single anon has questioned that.
>Thus empirical evidence is not objective
Stop making these autistic as fuck jumps! No, that doesn't just magically through meme magic make empirical evidence less objective. It's like you don't know what the word "empirical" means.
>but instead reliant on the subject measuring the empirical evidence.
We already explained how this doesn't work this way.
>Thanks for playing brainlet.
Kill your fucking self you logically dishonest, epistemological, question begging degenerate.