/lit/ - Literature

Sure is Literature in here

Or you could just stick around on 4chan, pretend you actually read, and become the authoritarian-despot of /lit/ who recommends neckbeards entry-level bullshit and makes "official" /lit/ recommendation lists
That works too

I was going to make one depicting /shit/ in all it's glory, but was overcame by lethargy

>>1112880
This anon has a point. If you're not really into loldeep, I'd suggest you stay away from what he mentioned.

Although for for taxi driver I gotta say...

Somebody say Dean?

>>1082115
Classic /lit/ response. I never specified the time span when I said "old", did I?

That's nice

Look ma, trolls

>>1058043
I'm here to support this statement

>but post your lists so I can get your area codes

But, whatever. Any crafty troll would've mailed dead chickens infected with smallpox by now

Trolling, Trolling down the river....

Yes, they were days

Oracles are always very cool, but also old as the dawn of time.

I'd suggest you pull out one of those old creepy story volumes you read as a kid and look through. Maybe the protagonist can be in two places at once, maybe his scar looks like a face and has a mind of it's own, maybe he suffers muscle aches and pain when he is near something that is dying.... I dunno

>>942491
Oh yeah...

"What is the difference between weight and wait?"

>>938460
now why would you want to do something like that

>>934918
>implying your initial post did not agree with me and simply add on in an irrelevant way
checkmate

basically this
>>896339

>Harsh pinnacle apex
>Semi-tanslucent commodities
>conformist, un-ending, dynamic second-guess awkwardness everlasting
these lines all kind of make me want to vomit. It's not bad, better than most of the stuff posted here

>>867046
ooooh, I love tea. Green trumps all

>>842246
sup brosef, I browse /lit/ in between /adv/

>determinism.png

>>818153
>implying time magazine has high quality content