[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18189036 [View]
File: 629 KB, 2000x2724, painting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18189036

>>18188993
People's tastes in feet differ a lot and I find that most footfags are extremely picky. I find 99% of the pics that other anons post of feet uninteresting or repulsive. For me, I prize grace, softness and sensitivity. Arches noticeable but not too high, not jutting. I prefer "stubbier" type toes (it's hard to express it more elegantly in words -- essentially toes that have a nice amount of flesh and aren't all gangly and bony, but are not "fat"). I also hate all artifice: painted toenails are an utter turnoff but I am also a homo but for ecumenical purposes I'm restricting this discussion to the female form. I also prize sensitivity: I want feet to be ticklish lol. I find it very cute and adorable to stimulate them in that way. I like to torture people's feet via tickling. Most people find it unbearable. It's exhilarating. The way you can have people writhing and gasping and begging(!) with the merest application of the pointed tip of a feather. I don't understand why people are so interested in "worshiping" feet or anything like that -- it is much more enjoyable to torment them. That's what I associate feet with anyway: humility, vulnerability, exposure. Not dominance like the femdom thing.
>>18189010
It's sexual for me.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]