/lit/ - Literature

>>5903706
Stirner.

He's actually pretty popular amongst certain types of disenfranchised people, but not because he argued that "group X should have these rights too!". He deconstructed this rights faggotry in itself, thereby on the one hand emancipating all kinds of freaks and on the other hand making a mockery of liberalist rhetoric about a right to freedom and preciousness. His approach is sort of a "might makes right", but in a pleasant and refreshing way.

>>5321019
Stirner is consistent, when he does away with worshipping arbitrary ideas he does away with all of them. Rand is on love with property rights and the free market and all kinds of spooks. Stirner just says: If you can hold onto it, it's yours. If not, it isn't. One of the great things about him is that he's actually willing to phase the consequences of his destructive philosophy and he's alright with them, while most others try to sneak some bullshit in through the back door.

>>5299071
And when a hard cunt comes along they try to give him the silent treatment.

>>4964091
Paying homage to the idol of Consent is pretty spooky.

>>4911460

>having wheels in your head

Stirner reposted.

>>4273435
Are you familiar with Casparus Maximator Stirnerii?

>>4250353
A lot of the time Stirner seems to enter the unspooked side of things when he goes "What Stirner says is a word, a thought, a concept; what he means is no word, no thought, no concept. What he says is not what is meant, and what he means is unsayable." but even when he enters that 'ultimate reality' (for lack of less sloppy words) I agree that he does remain intuitively selfist, if not so much ontologically as ethically.

After all, when both the Easterners and Stirner go beyond the self/non-self dichotomy and even if you were willing to say that their theoretical conclusion is identical, the Easterners attach a sort of harmonious mode of conduct to it where Stirner's approach is going happily outlaw disregarding as in pic related. You could say both sides of the medallion are equally spooked, since Eastern philosophy tends to attach a collective approach to a non-dualist conclusion as much as Maximum Forehead attaches an individualist one.

Stirner's egoism is consistent, Rand's egoism is "only businessmen can do what they want and should be protected against the evil poor people".

>>4152725

>>4008294

>>4000060
>Violence is always wrong.

>>3984138
The Ego and Its Own

>>3851484
>ideology

>>3844372
That's every discussion in the world ever.

>>3812801
He did as he pleased as well as he was able, silly. That doesn't mean he didn't practice what he preached.

This here my politics.