[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.21618803 [View]
File: 172 KB, 800x1000, Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21618803

>umm, it was actually Fichte
>umm, it was actually Schelling

But, nobody has actually read Fichte or Schelling.

How does this work?

>> No.18973819 [View]
File: 173 KB, 800x1000, Johann-Gottlieb-Fichte.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18973819

>he thinks his opinion on free will vs determinism has any weight whatsoever
>he hasn't read pic related

>> No.18644668 [View]
File: 173 KB, 800x1000, fichge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18644668

>>18643989
Fichte's 1804 Lectures BTFO every other "German Idealist" who bastardized and strawmanned the Fichtean revolution. Had we just paid as much attention to Fichte as we actually have with Kant or Hegel we would unironically be so much closer to having a genuine Ontology/Epistemology and not this charlatinism that infects every corridor of the Sciences both human and natural.

>> No.17638279 [View]
File: 173 KB, 800x1000, 00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17638279

Why does /lit/ ignore Johann Gottlieb Fichte? He is the most important German philosopher between Kant and Hegel. He had a lot of interesting arguments and ideas that I think /lit/ would find interesting

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]