/lit/ - Literature

>>7072352
>Why does lit never acknowledge that women are worshipped by society and favoured over men and have a really easy time getting sex or relationships? And that being an unattractive male (based on facial aesthetics or ethnicity) is hard? Why is it so controversial to say that many feminists just want unequally distributed advantages?

It happens all the time, despite those being topics for /r9k/ and /pol/. They only come up very occasionally in literature and often aren't that interesting in that context.

>Why are you guys never calling each other out on the narcissistic desire to be a novelist just for the sake of being a celebrity or part of the literati?
Most novelists are narcissists. If we tried to suppress that, there would be no more novels. Believe it or not, some people here actually like books and wish writers the best even if they're bad people.

>Why is Ayn Rand hated but Stirner loved? W.r.t. politics, is Chomsky pretty much right about everything? What about stuff relating to today's USA? Does he ever call out the illuminati / bilderberg?
Rand fucked up by trying to express herself in long novels while being a terrible prose stylists and rape fetishist. Chomsky is only rarely brought up here and he's criticized plenty despite being a topic for /pol/.

>Why is Reddit so repulsive to 4chan? Is it the sincerity? Strangely, /tv/ hates Reddit despite being just as willing to gobble up marketing bullshit.
Reddit's format and moderation are stifling. Nobody likes /tv/ here.

>Why will I be frowned upon for creating my own religion, even if it doesn't demand money from people or make them do anything illegal? Will le edgy anti atheists on lit defend me if I did?
Why would you care what people on /lit/ think of you? Do it or don't, damn dude.

Stupid, stupid frogposter.

>>7065959
>>7065963
>functionally illiterate tards getting BTFO
>y-you're just pretentious

>>7056280