/lit/ - Literature

>>11100583
are you proud of that for some reason?

>>11047612
Only a psued would critique something he has no knowledge of.

You can do better

>>10966527
this happened with me today

get a job or go to the library

>>8372475
The reason why people take their opinions to an anonymous platform like /pol/ (although you can be anonymous on most places on the internet, even if other websites have something like usernames and a profile you have to stick to) is because they know they are idiots who wouldn't take their retardation on to the street. Because they know they are idiots, but they still want to have that nice feeling of confirmation and support for their rejected opinions.
They pretend speaking out your opinion in public will get you incarcerated, which isn't true here in the US. And other people who would start hating you for very radical opinions might be shitty, but it isn't persecution either. In fact, it's a very logical consequence and nothing to get overly dramatic about, as /pol/ would do to glorify the value of their anonymity, like dickless keyboard warriors.
You assign too much idealistic value to anonymity, as if it is always the unrestrained truth just because people said it anonymously. If you could take a look at the people who post and also at the history of everything they've ever said, like on other internet platforms, you would know they are idiots and wouldn't take their opinion serious anymore. That's why /pol/ glorifies their platform. It's a haven and you never have to justify past opinion that have been proven completely wrong.
Not to mention that /pol/ is also an echochamber that will circlejerk all of their theories and misinterpretations of facts until it SOUNDS logical and fits their worldview. It's a very, very unhealthy case of confirmation bias.