/lit/ - Literature

Why does philosophical discourse always come off like riddles rather than actual logic?

>there isnt a pile of shit, it's merely your oculars and nasal passage manifesting a mere idea of the theory of poopy and on a cosmic level one would have to first define and then justify the definition of -

It's just a pile of shit. I know it and you know it. Any of this philosophical subjectivity would go away the moment I put on some latex gloves and shoved the shit into your face like a clown with a cream pie because your bullshit can't stand up to the objective reality.

>>20608387
Read Stirner

>>18972018
He refused to be categorized, but he had a very strong concept of private property and actually wrote anti-socialist writings that the government promoted until it was discovered that he was an anti-monarchist. He was also anti capitalist. He'd probably disagree with the moniker of anarchist too.

He believed in nothing, save for himself.

>>13937001
Because if they understood the book they wouldn't be anti-Stirner.

>>12989462
that's a spooky post, anon
better watch out

>>11078465
The "creative nothing" is what Stirner refers to the raw transmissions of the Logos as. As the meme goes, this transmission is obscured by the "spooks".

One hell of a ghost story

Its all a spook you nerds!