[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.15280260 [View]
File: 130 KB, 1826x1795, 1571850890536.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15280260

Always liked philosophy until I realized that I am retarded...
How do I smart?

>> No.13318588 [View]
File: 130 KB, 1826x1795, 1546847903663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13318588

>>13318571
Yes. It fails to meet any reasonable standard of evidence for such an event.
The majority of the "evidence" fails to even meet a basic standard for historical evidence without considering the extraordinary nature of the claim. It's flat out not evidence.
That being said what little "evidence" manages to not be laughable meets the same standard of other extreme claims made from other religions throughout history.
So in order to accept any evidence that Jesus resurrected, you have to both drop your standards of evidence through the floor AND ignore other evidence that meets that same dropped standard.
That's two too many brain oopsies for me to accept.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]