[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.23203445 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, elementaryparticles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23203445

This book ruined me

>> No.12185661 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, 41q2Gf5xSGL._SY344_BO1204203200_[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12185661

>> No.9493946 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, 41q2Gf5xSGL._SY344_BO1204203200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9493946

>>9493936

>> No.8592617 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, 41q2Gf5xSGL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8592617

>> No.7567149 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, atomised.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7567149

Post your favorite red pill books. I'll start.

>> No.7494152 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, elementaryparticles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7494152

Anybody else read Michel Houellebecq's "Elementary Particles" / "Atomized"?

This has blown me away. I read it all last night and this morning. It is the most impressive novel I've read in a while. The presentation and linking of obscure scientific facts, the sociological analysis, the humour, the emotion, the intensity of expression, I can see why it was so well received. I'm reading "The Loser" by Thomas Bernhard now and it seems so poor in comparison.

>> No.6954626 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, 41q2Gf5xSGL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6954626

why do houellebecq's books have such shitty cover design??

>> No.6182388 [View]
File: 16 KB, 224x346, elementary.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6182388

Shall we discuss some Houellebecq

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]