/lit/ - Literature

>>18057082
No, you miss the point entirely, because you are retarded.
Go throw yourself down the river like in antiquity when they didn't want the child, and let us see what fate meets you. You will always be a slave unless you live on Pluto.
And let me remind you, you paragon of projection, that I never asserted absolute control of the family.
You can't see past your own nose.
>Clearly, a retard like you against the state have adoptive services to help fatherless children to find fathers because that's communism to a fucking retard like you.
I never said I'm against it, idiot. I'm saying I don't like the communist notion (YOU YOURSELF HAVE CITED) of abolishing the family.
To your surprise perhaps, there exists a position outside of binaries, of the false dilemma you're trying to posit here of absolute control of the family or the abolition of it.
>The child does when they are able to reach the age to have the ability rebel against the family.
Almost as if that happens when you are 18 years old.
My entire point is that the notion of abolishing the family is based on premises that are already solved by the laws I referred to, and that you still can't figure it out is amazing.
Stop with the projecting, straw manning and false dilemmas.
>Who do you think enforces them. Fucking dumbass.
A giant difference between the fucking abolishment of the family and the state implementing laws to not get another raped in the ass nigger like you.