/lit/ - Literature

>>3637376

This absolutely isn't what anyone is suggesting. I think you know that. If you've read enough criticism to participate in this discussion you obviously know that there's more to the approach you're describing than that.

>>3637352

That mustachioed gentleman would almost definitely be on my side.

>>3237764

Ooja! I'm hardly going to fall for that, you imposter! The first mark of m'Jeeves is impeccable diction.'It time' indeed!

>>2716139

Guffaw!

I would actually like him to answer, though.

>>2688259

OH GOD, now I think YOU'RE MY CLOSEST FRIEND, YOU BIG LOVELY IDIOT!

I once read that comedians ought to abandon their work if they aren't capable of making themselves laugh whilst they write. I imagine that erotic authors have a similar standard, albeit a fleshier one.

Long story short,

'If you get wood,
the writing's good.
If you are wet,
Better yet.'