/lit/ - Literature

>>6778366
>it's good because you're so convinced you'll go to heaven you can't even imagine why it's bad
all history is made of the powerful exploiting the powerless. BNW pictured a society that was self-empowered, where industry and reproduction had total transparency and no corruption. You think that having drugs that makes them happy proves there's something wrong with the system?
>because i personally don't like these things about it
I don't think that rape and murder are objectively terrible, BECAUSE I personally don't like them, simpleton, they are objectively terrible by their own nature, my opinion doesn't even factor into it.
>>6778432
Oh a coherent thought like 'my picture is 2deep4u' and 'ur picture isn't as smart as me' like you do? I'm amazed that you're still grasping at the straws of pretending you're TOO intelligent for me. You know how you could convince me? By actually addressing any of the coherent points I've been making. Please?
Or is it just that, if a sentence is too long or a thought is more complicated than an advice animal meme, or a picture, it's not worth you thinking about? Holy shit, I see why you don't like BNW, Huxley must have hit too close to home. You have all the negative qualities of the brainwashed slaves you're so convinced you aren't.
>>6778436
check
>>6778444
>>6778458

>>6778441
Honestly, if I was born into that system and never knew anything else, and had all my needs provided for, and was kept entertained, and had a social life, AND was constantly high? I think that'd be a better life than at least half the human population already have.
>>6778455
what the
wow
oh wow all of my merciful tits
are you actually trying to argue that rape is a good thing? I'm just asking because it really looks like you're trying to argue that rape is a good thing. And rape is like drinking alcohol? Because some people don't like alcohol, which makes it like rape? Your awful, inhumane ideology is circling the bowl like the turd it is.
>>6778471
I agree. The model would only work if it was self-controlled by a population of intelligent, ethical, well-educated and hard-working citizens. Making it like people are cogs in a machine that occasionally need replacing would be great for two, maybe three thousand years. I'm talking about something that will have front-row seats when the sun burns out.
>>6778474
I hate to make assumptions but I think you're one of the smarter people here
>>6778481
pretty good analogy. Five men oppressing one woman works great for the majority, just like most societies have a bottom-class that do menial work that benefits the majority. Are the poorest not worth helping, since they're only 1/6th of all people?