[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21909489 [View]
File: 35 KB, 656x1000, 61yZ9rQHYSL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21909489

What is Hegel's masterwork?

It seems like the Phenomenology of Spirit is the most popular, but then the Greater Logic gets called his most brilliant work by a lot of Hegel experts.

If you were going to read one, which one should you start on?

>> No.21874876 [View]
File: 35 KB, 656x1000, 61yZ9rQHYSL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21874876

>>21874809
She had to pass into her opposite bro, to sublate it.

>> No.21862221 [View]
File: 35 KB, 656x1000, 61yZ9rQHYSL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21862221

What the FUCK is any of the supposed to mean? I got all As in the philosophy courses I took. This shit is nonsense. Is this guy a giant hoax?

>According to the second determination, it is the sphere within which fall the determinations and the entire movement of its reflection. Here, being will posit itself in three determinations:

>I as determinateness as such: quality

>II as sublated determinateness: magnitude, quantity

>III as qualitatively determined quantity: measure.

>At this stage, this division is, as was remarked of these divisions generally in the Introduction, a preliminary statement; its determinations have first to arise from the movement of being itself and in so doing define and justify themselves. As regards the divergence of this classification from the usual presentation of the categories, namely, as quantity, quality, relation and modality — these moreover with Kant are supposed to be only titles for his categories though they are, in fact, themselves categories, only more general ones — this calls for no special comment here, as the entire exposition will show a complete divergence from the usual arrangement and significance of the categories.

>This only perhaps can be remarked, that hitherto the determination of quantity has been made to precede quality and this as is mostly the case — for no given reason. It has already been shown that the beginning is made with being as such, therefore, with qualitative being. It is easily seen from a comparison of quality with quantity that the former by its nature is first. For quantity is quality which has already become negative; magnitude is the determinateness which is no longer one with being but is already differentiated from it, sublated quality which has become indifferent. It includes the alterableness of being, although the category itself, namely Being, of which it is the determination, is not altered by it. The qualitative determinateness, on the other hand, is one with its being: it neither goes beyond it nor is internal to it, but is its immediate limitedness. Quality therefore, as the immediate determinateness, is primary and it is with it that the beginning must be made.

>Measure is a relation, but not relation in general, for it is the specific relation between quality and quantity; the categories which Kant includes under relation will come up for consideration in quite another place. Measure can also, if one wishes, be regarded as a modality; but since with Kant modality is supposed no longer to constitute a determination of the content, but to concern only the relation of the content to thought, to the subjective element, it is a quite heterogeneous relation and is not pertinent here.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]