/lit/ - Literature

>>13575169
I don't think they desire it. Just like animals don't desire. We are just better off not "knowing" the meaninglessness.

I put meaning in quotes simply for the people who actually reject the "material plane", but of course that's either wishful thinking or in any case no good "rational" case can be made for it. The cop-out is then just to hate on rationality, which is convenient for them because /lit/ fags need a way to feel better than STEM fags and also "rational" STEM thinkers like Husserl or Russel are tedious and rather boring and easy to hate. But it's all cope - simply because rationality and physics is tedious and leads to nothing good, doesn't invalidate it in any way. Bashing this stuff is desperate cope.

>>10787709
>Yes, there are thousands of people more destructive to human progress than this guy.
Maybe not thousands, but zizek if def in the top 200.

>>10787713
>marxists
>not betas
Your entire evolution denialist ideology revolves around being PROUD of being a beta.
kill yourself lmao