/lit/ - Literature

What makes Russians so good at /lit/erature?

is this any good? thinking about educating myself but if it truly is fraudulent then it might not be worth my time

>>20717787

>>19764684

>>18902490
.

Possibly the scariest piece of literature ever to be written

>>18252745

>>15514126

There is one, timeless blueprint for world domination and mass control and it is pic related.

Like Evola and other authors argue, you should disregard the Jewish scapegoat narrative. The authors of protocols did probably employ antisemitism, but it still doesn't change the fact that the book literally describes total control and subjugation of any human population. Cultural, media, wars, societal, economical etc.

Why is this book dismissed as a 'forgery' and people ignore the contents of this document?

>The main argument adduced by the latter is that the Protocols reproduce and paraphrase in many parts the ideas found in a short book written by a certain Maurice Joly during the period of Napoleon's Second Empire. Allegedly, mysterious provocateurs of the Czar's secret police were responsible for writing the Protocols. This argument is truly irrelevant: those who decry plagiarism should keep in mind that this is not a matter of a literary work or of copyright. For example, when a general writes a plan, he could employ previous materials and writings as long as they contain ideas fit for his purpose. This would be a case of plagiarism, but it would not affect at all the question of whether or not this plan has really been conceived and carried out. Cutting short all this—that is, leaving aside the issue of the "authenticity" of the document in terms of real protocols stolen from an international secret organization—the only important and essential point is the following: this writing is part of a group of texts that in various ways (more or less fantastic and at times even fictional) have expressed the feeling that the disorder of recent times is not accidental, since it corresponds to a plan, the phases and fundamental instruments of which are accurately described in the Protocols. Hugo Wast wrote: "The Protocols may well be a fake, but their predictions have been fulfilled in an amazing way." Henry Ford added: "The only comment that I can make about the Protocols is that they perfectly correspond to what is happening today. They were published sixteen years ago, and ever since then they have corresponded to the world situation and today they still dictate its rhythm." In a sense, we can speak of a prophetic premonition.
-Julius Evola

The 'forged' chapters also constitute less than perhaps 10% of the whole text in question.

Seriously, the ability to not appreciate this book is the ultimate brainlet-filter. If you cannot seriously concentrate on the info it provides and when dropping the apparent Jewish scapegoat-narrative it is perhaps the most prophetic text concerning the upheavals that were to follow, including the world wars.

>It could be shown that even if the Protocols were a forgery perpetrated by provocateurs, nonetheless they reflect ideas very congenial to the Law and spirit of Israel. Second, it is true that many Jews have been and still are among the promoters of modern disorder in its more radical cultural expressions, whether political or social. This, however, should not prevent a deeper analysis, capable of exposing forces that may have employed modern Judaism merely as an instrument.
-Julius Evola