/lit/ - Literature

>>6859382

but it's not "logic" it's just a stupid language paradox and utterly trivial. i'm embarrassed for the british that one of their rockstar philosophers would even waste time on such stupid bullshit. it's like puzzling over one of those MC Escher drawings where the stairs are laid out in a square but each flight of stairs goes up to the next one. It's not a deep philosophical problem, it's just a neat trick with our tools for describing reality, in the barber case language, in the escher stair case, drawing. neither is significant or important in the slightest.