/lit/ - Literature

>>16542646
>In both instances the act of
understanding presupposes and implies something that cannot be understood;
this baffling element, however, is twofold and heterogeneous. Without the
one aspect (the `givenness' of causality) the understandable would cease to
exist and without the other (Existence being itself) there would be no content.

In uniting these two one will in the end always run up against Gödel's incompleteness theorem. More precisely, Tarski's generalization of that accursed theorem. This means that psychiatrists must face up to the fact that they are de facto ethicists. The last 50-60 years of psychiatric tradition (since Jung's death) were therefore meaningless.