[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22597126 [View]
File: 11 KB, 220x331, Better_Never_to_Have_Been.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22597126

Have you read this? What did you make of it?

He makes a good case intellectually but I just can't come to see my being born as a bad thing. I like my life and would be worse off if I weren't born.

>> No.22581949 [View]
File: 11 KB, 220x331, Better_Never_to_Have_Been.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22581949

Reproduction is a female burden. What does a male antinatalist even reject? He has no womb, no ovaries, no breasts. He has no capacity to produce a baby. Oh, you reject and judge women's reproductive choices instead? You want to control their bodies? Shut the fuck up.

Male antinatalism is *so* convenient... Reject something that was never your burden or ability in the first place and do it with a smug sense of moral superiority. Youre saving the world! Youre preventing suffering! How? By doing literally nothing but judging female choices?

Males have sex with women, ejaculate (proof of their sexual pleasure) and then women suffer the burdens and risks of pregnancy, nursing, and do the majority of early childhood care (unpaid work). What does the male antinatalist even reject? Is it the constant pressure on them to have children before their biological clock "runs out"? Nope. Is it a rejection of a society that tells a woman her role is primarily that of "mother"? Nope. Then what is it? It's nothing but the rejection of the inconvenience of having to provide and parent a woman's offspring, all under the guise of a moral philosophy. Its not even a rejection of sex! I doubt there would even *be* such a thing as a male antinatalist if contraception and condoms didn't even exist. A life of celibacy would actually require burdening themselves for the moral cause of antinatalism - when in reality its only a benefit. They get to fuck women without consequences, all in the name of morality. Of course the only truly celibate antinatalists are the incels, and they *hate* women. And gay males? They were never going to procreate anyway, so it's irrelevant.

Reproduction is female choice. Fuck moids, fuck Benatar, fuck the antinatalists.

>> No.22516218 [View]
File: 11 KB, 220x331, Better_Never_to_Have_Been.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22516218

What do you make of this book?

Hard mode: only those who have read it are allowed to respond.

>> No.22099697 [View]
File: 11 KB, 220x331, Better_Never_to_Have_Been.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22099697

>>22098654
Please check pic related. Imo Having no children has its own upsides and downsides. No commitment means more free time to do what you want. Evolutionarily, the desire to have no children is normal albeit rarer since in earlier societies the childless family member takes care of their nieces and nephews.

>> No.21643747 [View]
File: 11 KB, 220x331, Better_Never_to_Have_Been.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21643747

here you go brodie

>> No.19661947 [View]
File: 12 KB, 220x331, 5D4AA19F-9DB7-4012-B6A3-9B638CD0A417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19661947

>>19661923

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]