/lit/ - Literature

>>18891557
>>18891652

OR, for example, the meaning of "fulfilling the Law": the fulfilling being the exposure of the Black Sun, the full implication of the Law now being demonstrably insane, the Father's face, the Sun, being that which "does not even exist" relative to his anus, The Old Testament being the Father retaining his excrement for the perfect receiver, the "absence of the good", of his release, he finally drops the pretense and reveals that the abjection of human sacrifice was the whole point all along, the event being as obscene as the sight of literal excrement.

Practice is an absurd idea. It is demonstrable that "too much" or "the wrong kind of" practice has no effect at best, and can even cause regression. However, no one can demonstrate what "the right amount" or "the right kind" of practice is, one simply backwardly-reasons that the practice must have been as such if it yields the desired results and likewise backwardly-reasons it as "too much" or "the wrong kind of" practice if it does not. The assumption that practice actually does anything at all being totally unfounded and Empirically untenable. I am familiar with arguments against causality in general, whether Materialist or Idealist, and request texts specifically about practice.

>pic unrelated