/lit/ - Literature

>>15340045
>humanity's flaws are single-handedly responsible for the predatory economy of nature
They literally are. Adam was placed as a steward/king and a high priest over the entire cosmos and his sinful action had direct consequences on his domain. Wouldn't a father engaging in major sin (say alcholism) bring the consequences back to his home and his family?
>Doesn't the creation pre-exist man, why does his sin pollute the rest of the divine order?
Humanity has an extremely special place in the created order, as only humans are a direct image of the Logos. No other creature can claim such a high place in creation. So when humanity gets stained, the entirety of creation reflects this. Creation is for man, not the other way around.
>contain man's folly
God freely chooses giving Adam free will over stronghanding Adam into not breaking his commandment. He did ultimately contain Adam's folly though, by incarnating and deifying human nature in preparation for fulfilling His original plan for creation.
>doesn't involve throwing him into a contingent material universe
The entire universe and created order was originally in a deified/divinized state, suitable for someone made in the image of God.
>monkeys stranded in such a universe
Atheistic nonsense.

>>15340073
Unironically this. Do you think the martyrs who were literally given the choice to reject Christ didn't freely die for Him?