/lit/ - Literature

>>17998067
Why are you like this dude?

>>16421097
>Yes, but also no. In the context of modern science, you have this backwards. Modern science is based on power and on that basis lays its claim on truth. It's an unconvincing claim.
You seek a deeper authentic reality but you do so in an effort to gain power over your life, you are no different from the scientists.
>Tradition as a quality of being spiritually awake and in touch with your nonmaterial self. Read the Traditionalists (or any of the great spiritual thinkers like the Buddha, the Tantrikas etc) if you want a holistic review of the concept.
Tradition is not an intrinsic quality of being spiritually awake and the non-material self isn't any less a concept than matter.

>>14366197
>New to accelerationism?
Yes. I was wondering. What is the Landian perspective on cunny?