/lit/ - Literature

>>17564075
>>17564405
>>17564530
Nagarjuna's so called 'arguments' were posted in another thread >>17562990

and I swiftly refuted them here >>17563419 by pointing out how they rely on sophistic reasoning, the Buddhists in that thread have given up on even trying to argue that I'm wrong in refuting Nagarjuna. If I, a mere anon, can refute the arguments of Mahayana Buddhism's most vaunted philosopher in a matter of minutes, I can scarcely imagine what Sri Shankaracharya (pbuh) would have done had he ever gotten his hands on the pile of sophistry known as the 'Mulamadhyamakakarika'
>>17565554
My friend, you are asking for the impossible, but it's good of you to seek to challenge yourself intellectually regardless of that, and you should keep doing seeking to do so in various ways.