/lit/ - Literature

>>6955888
no he is not, he is biased from the very beginning
is argument is tautological

this stance says that somebody else than the fetus can calculate the utility of the fetus's life. Here the utility is null since at 8 weeks, nobody feels anything as we suppose that the utility comes from the senses.

The thing is that singer denies, beforehand, the possibility of the fetus to feel anything since you abort it before it can feel anything. So singer stance is the fallacy : let us prove that the fetus can be aborted by saying that it can be aborted. He does not let the fetus a chance to actually be relevant in his doctrine.


Furthermore, he does not take into account the utility of the father, who could very well be pained by the abortion (reminder that the females do not need to even tell the fathers about the pregnancies). If the female does not take into account the wishes of the father, then we must look at what happened before the ejaculation, aka the sex.

>>6927154