/lit/ - Literature

>>21404867
>It doesn't matter how much you plan economic activity
it obviously does, because the more you plan, the more you can consciously avoid damaging the environment by picking the methods that don't and by tying the application of any potentially damaging methods with the application of corresponding counter-measures.
>>21404976
>No?
yes, you're literally dismissing it by saying it's not relevant to maintaining a productive economy, which is analogical to dismissing Newton's laws by saying they're not relevant to maintaining gravity.
both Marx's and Newton's laws describe processes that come about without humans intentionally bringing them about. whereas you mistakenly assume that Marx's laws are something that's supposed to be consciously enacted by people. it's the complete opposite: Marx describes laws that communism abolishes
>That is the over-arching goal of economics
fair, but Marx's work is not economics, it's a critique of economics. see pic, you should be able to understand what it says it even if you don't know German