/lit/ - Literature

How do you translate eloquent dialogue, general speech-speaking oration, convincing rhetoric into writing a nice book? I have all these aphorismus and notes and ideas, but I just can't for the life of me explain anything I state in them properly, or write well, in the way I would talk about them. This free and almost carefree but determinate style I talk to people with; maybe it's all just charisma; in that case, how do you make a book charismatic?

Sorry if this is offtopic, but it feels relevant to people writing here; most people on this board could use a dash of proper rhetoric and charisma, even if its just to talk about the ever-same books in a better way, and not to write ones themselves.

>>18374120
So he’s still got time to find the love of his life and get married!

>>18328298
Nietzsche
Kropotkin
Bakunin
Graeber
Michael Hudson (economist, not the male model)
And Epicurus

Marius the Epicurean

>>17487080
Forest of Doom
City of Thieves
Caverns of the Snow Witch
Ian Livingstone was fun

>>16626420
>i right too language vary well

Writing you like
Writing you’ll keep liking, because it’s quality, and you go back to it every once in a while.
Writing that makes you feel BETTER, not depressed.

>>16042635
>kys
You need to f*gging chill.

>>12827112
Easily, thank you.

>>10007184
/a/ invasions.
Just books now, s4s

>>8836150
>Best

It all depends on what you're looking for. Honestly.

>>7261556
Some things are "on a rail". The course of Meteorites, planets, the life of a star or nebula, smaller things too. But some things no.

>>7261575
>only christfags don't believe in determinism
Some do some don't. I'm atheist. "Determinism" is as bad an idea to believe in as an "afterlife".
Freedom in a singular life is best life.

>>7261613
>pleasant reality.
You just don't understand the nature of freedom.