/lit/ - Literature

>>3209772
Stop sucking Sokal´s dick, please, or at least do it in ample privacy.

If you had a clue about the scientific method, you would quickly realize Sokal didn´t prove anything; his trick amounts to little more than a moment of embarrassment of the particular journal..

>>3052399
Are you niggas serious?

Kubrick, Welles, or Hitchcock are in a completely different league than the likes of Anderson or Aronofsky.

>Malick
>experimental
>sophisticated

And, are you really implying Godard is anything more than a straightforward political hack?

>Religious texts are probably in the same category

>>2837297
Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

>litterary works
>Nietzsche

>>2622729
>has read all of Heidegger

>>2199054
boy I miss that guy. he actually posted a poem of his last tuesday, holy shit.

>>1922992

That's still surprisingly narrow-minded for a person of an alternative lifestyle. Obviously, if you already abide so strongly by that mindset there's little I can say on the matter without inciting rancor, so I'll just leave it at that.

>>1674755
Name of the Wind had good prose, but it was corny. it was an Oprah book. i did not care for it.