[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20807672 [View]
File: 45 KB, 520x415, AVT_Ludwig-Wittgenstein_8451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20807672

I fucking hate philosophy so much, any books for this feel?

>> No.19838866 [View]
File: 46 KB, 520x415, AVT_Ludwig-Wittgenstein_8451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19838866

Why the fuck isn't Wittgenstein more influencial ?
He basically proved that all meta-physical questions have no actual meaning, yet modern philosopher still continue to wonder about these kind of questions. In philosophy teaching they still discuss about topics like "what is courage" etc, when it was proven to be moot.
I mean, even in common parlance it should now be admitted that 80% of all "deep" questions don't actually have any meaning, yet we still continue to function that way, and assume that 1 word = 1 thing.
Why is that ? you'd think his work would have been a true redpill

>> No.19797627 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 46 KB, 520x415, AVT_Ludwig-Wittgenstein_8451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19797627

Did he basically solve philosophy?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]