/lit/ - Literature

>>12988177
>shiiitt dawg, we is like in the past now, so we both is kangz and was kangz, and we was kangz in the future, so we will be kangz too, so shiiit dawg, we is always been kangz, all because we was kangz in the here and now dawg, sheeet this is like some zhuang zhi type shit, damn i need to stop smoking that pure french dope dawg

>>10734075
I thought ritalin only did that to adolescents? Either way I only took it twice and I won't again. As far as the other stuff, I do all of it except ditching my phone and meditating. I stopped watching TV and using social media many years ago and haven't played games in a while so really I just need to gtfo of my phone and start committing to tasks

I read a book today that said solipsism was an impossible theory, but it didn't go on to debunk it. Why is solipsism so obviously untrue? People say that otherwise you would be God and God is all powerful, which you are not, therefore you can't be the only conscious being. But what if God is so powerful he took away his own power? Or what if I am a dream God is having?